Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have till February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand employment in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to depart and be paid till completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal employees as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it so much an offer. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague pledge that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is because there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I think that’s an extremely deceptive term to utilize in this scenario. When you consider a buyout, there’s usually some sort of written contract or a concrete offer to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: employment If clients ask you for your suggestions, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe caution. There are no in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the firm’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of worker who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most careful since leaving earlier than meant can have severe repercussions, employment potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for people who don’t want to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal workers that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the alternative to resign, employment and this administration is extremely generously offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work actually tough to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals’s eyes due to the fact that there are no warranties. And these are individuals who love their task. They like the mission of the firm. They strive. And right now, they’re facing really tough choices, specifically if they’re remote. I indicate, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: employment You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, employment if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal challenges simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be honest, is so unprecedented that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to determine what to do with it. I’m unsure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I believe the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not aware of any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase companies to offer this number of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is really much perhaps setting the stage for challenges because I feel OPM has actually greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website regards to use and consents pages at www.npr.org for more info.

NPR records are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its last form and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability may differ. The reliable record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.